James O Donnell shared this photo on Instagram of his border collie Iggy patiently waiting for his stout to settle at the Shamrock Lodge in Falcarragh last night.James shared it with the caption; “A wee pint in honour of Barry, yesterday evening. Missed by all at the Shamrock and Friday night dominoes.”Sometimes Iggy can be found on the other side of the bar! We’re sure this fluffy barfly can help cheer you up if you’re feeling a little melan-collie!Iggy settles in with a pint after a ‘ruff’ day was last modified: October 8th, 2016 by Elaine McCalligShare this:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Tags:DOGFalcarraghiggyShamrock Bar
Red Bluff >> In the second performance of the Red Bluff Round-Up, the saddle bronc riding changed leads by a half-point.An Oklahoma cowboy took the lead after the second performance of the Red Bluff Round-Up, the nation’s largest three-day rodeo.Hardy Braden, Welch, Okla., scored a half-point better than Friday night’s high score to be 85 points going into Sunday’s performance.Braden, who is 28 years old, rode the Calgary Stampede horse Turbo Rocket, a twelve-year-old mare, for the win. …
Apparently Eugenie Scott of the NCSE is feeling no remorse from her appearance in Ben Stein’s documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, where she defended the actions of those who ruined careers, denied tenure, and deprived students and teachers of their academic freedom because they dared to question Darwin. Her latest piece in Scientific American is as adamant as ever: the creationists, ever morphing their tactics by a kind of sinister evolution, need to be eradicated. With co-author Glenn Branch, Eugenie Scott summarized the history of creationism and the court cases that have stymied them. Using the projection theme of a crook “donning a fake mustache” to hide his identity, Scott portrayed a shape-shifting bogeyman that can be shown no mercy but must be expelled. The subtitle reads, “Creationists who want religious ideas taught as scientific fact in public schools continue to adapt to courtroom defeats by hiding their true aims under ever changing guises.” After thoroughly discrediting the motives of creationists in Louisiana and Georgia who merely requested that students use critical thinking when exploring evolution, she explained why these apparently innocent requests deserved to be defeated: one doesn’t grant academic freedom to liars:In the meantime, it is clear why the Louisiana Science Education Act is pernicious: it tacitly encourages teachers and local school districts to miseducate students about evolution, whether by teaching creationism as a scientifically credible alternative or merely by misrepresenting evolution as scientifically controversial. Vast areas of evolutionary science are for all intents and purposes scientifically settled; textbooks and curricula used in the public schools present precisely such basic, uncomplicated, uncontroversial material. Telling students that evolution is a theory in crisis is—to be blunt—a lie. Moreover, it is a dangerous lie, because Dobzhansky was right to say that nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution: without evolution, it would be impossible to explain why the living world is the way it is rather than otherwise. Students who are not given the chance to acquire a proper understanding of evolution will not achieve a basic level of scientific literacy. And scientific literacy will be indispensable for workers, consumers and policymakers in a future dominated by medical, biotechnological and environmental concerns.Creationists will continue their pattern of “steady misrepresentation,” she said, by finding new ways to chip away at Darwin’s theory of evolution. What are honest citizens to do? “But because the passage of such antievolution bills ultimately results from politics rather than science, it will not be the progress of science that ensures their failure to endure,” she said. “Rather it will take the efforts of citizens who are willing to take a stand and defend the uncompromised teaching of evolution.”Eugenie, Eugenie, please. This piece is so loaded with fallacies, lies and misrepresentations you should be ashamed of yourself. Readers, look at this. This lady knows better than to make such allegations. She has heard numerous scholars and scientists who are not fundamentalist Christians make the same arguments against dogmatic Darwinism, among them David Berlinski, Steve Fuller and Ben Stein. She has met face to face with Phillip Johnson and the leading lights of the intelligent design movement and various creationist organizations. She knows these people are not crooks with fake mustaches. In fact, she knows that most of them are nicer people than her fellow persecutors. She knows many of them have more degrees in science than she does. And she knows that no philosopher of science would defend the image of “science vs superstition” she is portraying. This piece has all the marks of a hit man knowing his job depends on showing the boss some blood. As a full-time employee of an organization whose sole purpose is to keep creationism out of the public arena, do you think she could dare face her board of directors and contributors with anything less than enthusiastic loyalty to the cause? Conscience be expelled; she is not going to draw her pay by feeling remorse for continuing one of the most egregious persecutions of scholars, scientists and citizens in recent history. If that takes a few lies and misrepresentations, so be it. (The best lies are calling your enemies liars, misrepresenting them as misrepresenters, and having an agenda to accuse them of having an agenda.) Eugenie, please. Don’t you realize that any special interest group could use the tactics you keep using? It’s never the Big Science Academy that has evil motives (don’t read those emails against Guillermo Gonzalez), it’s your straw bogeyman. It’s never the Darwin Party that lies (don’t look at those Haeckel embryos); it’s only the bogeyman. It’s never the DODO heads (Darwin-Only 2x) that misrepresents, changes tactics, and has an agenda – it’s only the bogeyman. You know these people. You know how nice and honest many of the persecuted outcasts are, and you know how cruel and heartless can be many of your comrades in arms. You would rather befriend foul-mouthed P.Z. Myers than kind-hearted, wise old Phillip Johnson. You would rather ruin a man’s career than listen to his scientific arguments for design. You would rather sue a school than let them dare think that Darwin might have had less than the whole truth. How can you look in the mirror in the morning? This charge of creationists only being politically motivated is so tiring. It is so hypocritical. If Eugenie’s special-interest group lost a court case, you know she would be the first to change tactics and put on a fake mustache. If she were marginalized, you know she would be the first crying out for academic freedom. If the Darwin Party were losing, you know she would be the first to demand the right to critically examine the majority’s claims and give both sides a hearing. If the Dover case had gone against the NCSE, you could hear the screams of protest she would make about how defining science is no business of a Republican judge. And if Eugenie’s rights were being systematically stripped away by a powerful institution, you know she would not willingly cede territory to tyranny without a political fight, no matter how hopeless the prospects for success might appear. She would get into political contests and school board races and cling to the eroding cliff of intellectual freedom as long as she could. BUT – when she has the power to yank freedom from others, she is merciless:Ms. Scott, we sincerely believe, on scientific and philosophical grounds, that Darwinism is deeply flawed. Can we have equal time to present alternatives? NO! (11/08/2004)OK, then; can have a few minutes per semester? NO!OK, then; can we let students know alternatives exist? NO! 12/20/2005)Is there any way for the D word design to be uttered in science class? NO!OK, forget the science class. We assume we could teach both sides of the design debate in a philosophy class, right? NO! (01/25/2006)How about teaching more evolution? We could teach both the strengths and weaknesses of Darwinism, couldn’t we? NO! (05/13/2004)Can a teacher at least refer to secular peer-reviewed journals that mention problems with evolution? NO! (09/12/2004)Can a teacher put material at the back of the room for browsing, with no pressure or obligation? NO! (06/14/2005)Surely you would allow a teacher to encourage students to think critically? NO! (06/16/2005)Can a teacher mention that the textbook is presenting lies as evidence for evolution? NO! (07/25/2003)Can we put a teeny tiny sticker in the textbook asking students to think with an open mind? NO! (04/09/2004, 01/06/2007)Can we mention there are books in the school library with different views? NO!Can we teach evolution by the textbook, but perhaps mention a little about the factual history of Darwin’s influence on politics? NO! (03/25/2007)If students write papers critical of Darwinism on their own initiative, can they get a decent grade? NO!Can we promote academic freedom? NO!Can we complain when NCSE material claims Darwinism is compatible with religion? NO! (04/03/2006)Can Dr. Darwin-Doubter get tenure if he doesn’t voice any of his doubts about Darwin in the classroom? NO! (05/22/2007)After a Darwin-doubting professor has been expelled and lost his tenure appeal, can he get a job as a truck driver (example) to feed his family? We’ll get back to you….If you want to get really shocked and angry at what the Darwin Pary has done to respectable scientists and teachers who dared to question Darwin, get the new book Slaughter of the Dissidents by Dr. Jerry Bergman – himself a victim of Darwinist discrimination. On top of all this, Ms. Scott routinely portrays herself as a poor, lonely freedom fighter against the powerful religious right. She heaps scorn on those evil creationists, the only ones in town with an “agenda” who are nefariously trying to corrupt science and ruin America. Does that profile fit Dr. Richard Sternberg, a double-PhD research scientist? No way. But look what she said when he was hounded out of the Smithsonian for allowing a pro-design paper to be published in a scientific journal according to the rules of peer review, leading to a Congressional investigation that concluded evolutionists on staff had created a hostile work environment to pressure him out. Eugenie Scott graciously said this in response: Sternberg got what he deserved and should be glad something worse didn’t happen to him (see Evolution News #1, #2 #3). It was shameful – but she was shameless. It must be an awful burden to bear on one’s conscience. This humorless lady has to face looking back over her life some day and realizing she spent most of her years denying the majority of Americans the right to question dogma. We can only hope she will open her beloved Daddy Darwin’s inspired scripture and read, “A fair result can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question.” That’s not only the American way. Darwin was no American. That’s the scientific way. Exercise: Aim your Baloney Detector at Branch and Scott’s hit piece. Scoring: One point for each propaganda tactic, logical fallacy or smokescreen detected. Two points for each lame excuse for Darwin-only “science.” Three points for each allegation that is more justifiably aimed at the Darwin Party. If this exercise gets you worked up, you can do something about it.(Visited 12 times, 1 visits today)FacebookTwitterPinterestSave分享0
6 June 2006South Africa’s only stock exchange, the JSE Ltd, listed on its own exchange on Monday morning.In a momentous occasion in the history of the exchange, guests were joined by Deputy President Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, and wore a variety of hats in memory of the closing day of the old trading floor nearly 10 years ago to the day.By 10.30am the JSE had traded in the same region of trades seen in heavyweight companies BHP Billiton and First Rand.The JSE now joins an elite number of international bourses – including the London and New York stock exchanges, Deutsche Borse, Nasdaq, Euronext, the Australian Stock Exchange, the Singapore Exchange and the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing – that have listed on their own markets.For investors in South Africa and abroad, the move brings heightened transparency and visibility to the trading of JSE shares, which in turn has the potential to improve their liquidity and tradeability.The appearance of the JSE Ltd on the main board will allow international and local investors – including institutional and retail investors – the opportunity to compare the JSE as a listed company against its other listed peers.For brokers, many of whom have been members of the JSE for decades, the listing brings yet another counter onto their books to trade.“For the JSE, the listing brings with it an opportunity to both showcase itself to investors as a well-governed company as well as the opportunity to broaden our shareholder base through a broad-based black economic empowerment initiative that was integral to the listing,” said Russell Loubser, CEO of the newly listed exchange.The broad-based BEE initiative consists of two parts: a Black Shareholder Retention Scheme aimed at retaining existing black shareholders, and a JSE Empowerment Fund aimed at funding education for black people wanting to work in the financial services industry.The initiatives will raise the JSE’s direct black shareholding to over 10%.“This listing firmly entrenches the JSE’s commitment to transformation and allows us to lead by example in every aspect of corporate life, including black economic empowerment, as a critical consideration in the social landscape of South Africa today,” said JSE chairman Humphrey Borkum.“It has taken 10 years of hard work to get the JSE to a stage where it can proudly stand up and be counted amongst its peers as a listed company,” said Loubser. “But if you had to ask any of my team, they’d tell you without hesitation that it’s been worth the wait.”As a listed company, the JSE counter appears in the general financial-investment services sector under the alpha code JSE.SouthAfrica.info reporter Want to use this article in your publication or on your website?See: Using SAinfo material
22 July 2011In a first for a South African bank, First National Bank has launched the FNB Banking Application, an “app” that gives users of smartphones and tablet computer devices easy access to their accounts online.South Africa currently has an estimated 16% smartphone penetration, which according to information technology research company Gartner will ramp up to 80% by 2014. Global sales of tablet computers and smartphones are predicted to exceed PC, notebooks and netbooks in 2011.The app market is also predicted to grow by 60%.The FNB Banking App is available for Android, Apple and Blackberry devices, with an app for devices running the Symbian platform expected before the end of August.“At FNB we are constantly looking at ways to improve on our innovations, staying one step ahead of our competitors and consistently adding value and choice for our customers,” FNB chief executive Michael Jordaan said in a statement this week.“In an increasingly digital world in which smartphones, tablet devices and apps are changing the way we communicate and live, the introduction of the FNB Banking App will enable us to widen our offering allowing us to provide our customers with convenient banking solutions and great user experience.”Immediate secure accessThe app gives users immediate and secure access to their bank accounts, allowing them to view account lists and detailed transactional histories, perform transactional services like transfers between accounts, as well as pay beneficiaries.“The solution will give our customers a convenient, anytime, anywhere digital banking solution, rich in user experience,” said Jordaan. “We are glad to say that this App is a home grown creation and has been developed in house by FNB Connect, the bank’s internal internet service provider.”Value added servicesIn addition to banking services, a few of the value added services include allowing customers to find FNB branches and ATMs using location based services, as well as access to an immediate FNB branch list directory, making free calls to any FNB contact centres and cheap outbound calls to other numbers.The Banking App also has functionality for users to view foreign exchange rates.“We understand the demand for instant and ‘on the go’ banking from our customers and our App provides easy access to banking through a single sign on process. One step is all it takes to safely access your bank account,” said FNB Connect’s Farren Roper.“The App was designed for quick deployment into new and existing markets as it works off any network and off a 3G or WiFi access medium. Smartphone and tablet device users and require mobility and multi-functionality and we designed our App with this user profile in mind.“The App gives the multi-tasker a quick, one stop and convenient banking experience.”To use the service, customers who have Apple devices can download the App from the Apple App store, Android customers from the Android Market, while Blackberry customers can get the App from the Blackberry App World.SAinfo reporterWould you like to use this article in your publication or on your website? See: Using SAinfo material
Share Facebook Twitter Google + LinkedIn Pinterest The Fourth General Session featured presentations Ohio’s representative on the National FFA Officer Team Sydney Snider, creed speaking contest winner Austin Becker from Fairbanks, and prepared speaking winner Josie Montoney from Amanda Clearcreek. CDE winners, top Ohio officers and agriscience fair recognition and state officer parents were recognized. Josie Montoney, Amanda-Clearcreek,won the prepared speaking contest. Sydney Snider Austin Becker, Fairbanks, was the Creed Contest winner
If you believe there is some external reason you can’t produce the results you want, you must be willing to look at the evidence stacked up against you. The evidence strongly suggests that there are people who are producing that same result under the same circumstances.Here is how I know this is true:One person believes their company is too expensive, that they can’t beat their irrational competitor, and that there is no way to command the price they need. Other salespeople in the sales company with the same pricing model and the same irrational competitor are going to President’s club. If it is possible for the people who are succeeding to sell and win, it is possible for you.You might use the excuse that you don’t have time to do whatever it is that you should be doing, like exercising, reading, meditating, working more or some other activity that would improve your life. There are other people—some of them busier than you—who use the same 24 hours that you have to do some or all of these things. Of course, these people are armed with the superpowers of self-discipline, focus, and priorities, superpowers that are available to you whenever you want them.Excuses absolve you of the responsibility to change, to do something different. When you choose to use something external as an excuse, you do so because there is nothing you can do about something outside of your control. If there is nothing you can do about whatever you are using as an excuse, you are free from the responsibility to do something different—even if you are not free of the consequences.Your government, your manager, your territory, your pricing model, and your irrational competitor are not valid excuses. You share all these things with other people who are succeeding. Neither is being constrained by the same 24 hours that you share with all the other inhabitants of planet Earth.Your excuses aren’t true. They’re just a way to absolve yourself of the responsibility to change.
Former Premier League manager Harry Redknapp said his players bet on the result of one of their matches, according to the newspaper investigation that has seen England coach Sam Allardyce lose his job.The Daily Telegraph’s undercover reporters filmed Redknapp discussing the game although the 69-year-old later told the paper he did not think it was against FA rules at the time.However, FA rules ban players from betting on matches they are involved in and managers are expected to report any misconduct.The Telegraph said lawyers for Redknapp said he was not aware of players betting on the match at the time.The newspaper did not say which club was involved. (Sam Allardyce contrite after being sacked as England manager)Former West Ham United, Portsmouth, Southampton, Tottenham Hotspur and Queens Park Rangers manager Redknapp met reporters posing as representatives of a Far East firm that wanted to break into English football’s billion-pound transfer market.Redknapp has denied any wrongdoing. (England manager Sam Allardyce caught in newspaper sting)The newspaper’s revelations have so far led to Allardyce and Barnsley assistant manager Tommy Wright losing their jobs. Allardyce was sacked on Tuesday after the FA said he had behaved inappropriately following secret filming that showed him offering advice to businessmen on how to circumvent rules on player transfers. (Sam Allardyce sacked by English Football Association after newspaper sting)
New Delhi, Dec 3 (PTI) A blanket of haze enveloped the national capital on a cold day today, prompting the people to wear masks outside home.Air quality dropped to hazardous levels in the city. The choking smog even disrupted the third Test between Sri Lanka and India.The embattled Sri Lankan cricket team held up play, complaining of poor air quality that forced the hosts to declare their innings.The first-ever incident of this kind in the sports 140- year-old history saw an international team resort to anti- pollution masks while fielding and then refusing to continue.The India Meteorological Department said pollution levels have spiked due to calm conditions, marked by low wind speed and moisture.The IMD has forecast possibility of light rains on December 5 and 6.Meanwhile, the city recorded a high of 23.9 degrees Celsius, a low of 8 degrees Celsius, a MeT department official said.The humidity levels oscillated between 39 and 94 per cent.The weatherman has predicted partly cloudy sky tomorrow.”Mist/shallow fog likely to occur in the morning. The maximum and minimum temperature would be around 24 and 9 degrees Celsius respectively,” the MeT official said. PTI AG GVS
England’s Football Association’s plans to sell Wembley Stadium and invest around £600 million into grassroots facilities and projects were in tatters on Wednesday after potential purchaser, American Shahid Khan, withdrew his offer.The billionaire owner of the NFL (National Football League) club Jacksonville Jaguars made his offer public in April and the proposed sale had been discussed by the FA’s Board with the full FA Council to have voted on the matter on October 24.However, the outcome was in doubt with the sale of the iconic national stadium dividing opinion.”At a recent meeting with Mr Khan he expressed to us that, without stronger support from within the game, his offer is being seen as more divisive than it was anticipated to be and has decided to withdraw his proposal,” FA chief executive Martin Glenn said in a statement.”There has been much deliberation on both sides of this debate and it has undoubtedly raised awareness of the issue that community football facilities in England need significant investment.””We will continue to work together to identify new and innovative ways of investing in community football facilities in the future,” added Glenn.Khan, who also owns English Premier League club Fulham, said his offer had not received the backing he had hoped for.”At this moment, following last week’s FA Council hearing, it appears there is no definitive mandate to sell Wembley and my current proposal, subsequently, would earn the backing of only a slim majority of the FA Council, well short of the conclusive margin that the FA Chairman has required,” Khan said in a statement.advertisement”The intent of my efforts was, and is, to do right by everyone in a manner that strengthens the English game and brings people together, not divides them,” he added.There had been opposition to the sale from within the game with some critics questioning the wisdom of surrendering ownership of the national stadium and others sceptical of the future investments in the game.”Unfortunately, given where we are today, I’ve concluded that the outcome of a vote next week would be far from sufficient in expressing the broad support favored by the FA Chairman to sell Wembley Stadium,” Khan said.”Until a time when it is evident there is an unmistakable directive from the FA to explore and close a sale, I am respectfully withdrawing my offer to purchase Wembley Stadium.”However Khan left the door open, should his idea win broader backing.”I cannot rule out revisiting the opportunity at another time when perhaps the Football Association family is unified in its views on the opportunity,” he said.”I recognize the passion many people have for Wembley and what it means to English football, and will be willing to re-engage with the FA on this matter under proper circumstances.”The new Wembley Stadium opened in 2007 on the site of the original venue and cost around £750 million to build.Under the plan, Wembley would have remained the home to major football matches such as the FA Cup final and would also have been available to England for internationals — outside of autumn when it could have been used for NFL games.